Historical collection · First published Oct 31, 2024; added to EM Weekly Oct 27, 2026. This retrospective summary may be superseded by later evidence or guidance.
← All articlesA Randomized Trial of Drug Route in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Summary
PARAMEDIC-3 randomized 6,082 adults with OHCA requiring drug access to an IO-first or IV-first strategy. Thirty-day survival was 4.5% versus 5.1% (adjusted OR 0.94; 95% CI 0.68–1.32; P=.74). Favorable neurologic outcome at discharge was 2.7% versus 2.8%.
Why it matters
Rapid IO placement alone is not evidence of a survival advantage over starting with IV access. Preserve IO as an alternative when IV access is unsuccessful or impractical.
Study at a glance
- Design
- Randomized trial
- Population
- Adults with OHCA needing vascular access for drug treatment.
- Sample size
- 6082
- Intervention
- IO-first vascular access.
- Comparator
- IV-first vascular access.
- Primary endpoint
- Survival at 30 days.
Main findings
- Any ROSC: 36.0% versus 39.1%; adjusted OR 0.86 (95% CI 0.76–0.97).
- One adverse event was reported in the IO group.
Limitations
Open-label pragmatic strategy trial in 11 UK EMS systems. Low survival and wide confidence intervals limit certainty about modest differences; secondary analyses were not adjusted for multiplicity.
Read the primary source
Full text: Open-access full text available.
Original sourcePMID: 39480216
Material reviewed: abstract.
Source retrieved Oct 27, 2026. Historical backfill. PubMed primary abstract and electronic publication date reviewed; the legal PMC author manuscript is available but was not reviewed in full.
Corrections & review history
No corrections recorded. Human review: not yet human-reviewed.