Mechanical Thrombectomy 24 to 72 Hours after Large-Vessel Ischemic Stroke
Summary
LATE-MT randomized 336 patients in China with anterior-circulation large-vessel occlusion, imaging-identified salvageable tissue, and presentation 24 to 72 hours after onset or last-known-well to thrombectomy plus medical care or medical care alone. At a median 38.5 hours to randomization, thrombectomy improved the 90-day modified Rankin scale distribution (common OR for better functional outcome 1.74, 95% CI 1.19-2.55). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 4.8% versus 0%, and 90-day case fatality was 6.0% versus 1.8%.
Why it matters
This is randomized evidence that selected patients with salvageable tissue may benefit from thrombectomy beyond the current 24-hour evidence window. It supports urgent thrombectomy-center discussion for carefully selected very-late presenters, but does not establish universal treatment beyond 24 hours.
Study at a glance
- Design
- Randomized trial
- Population
- Adults with anterior-circulation large-vessel occlusion ischemic stroke, imaging-identified salvageable tissue, and presentation 24 to 72 hours after symptom onset or last-known-well.
- Sample size
- 336
- Intervention
- Endovascular thrombectomy plus standard medical care.
- Comparator
- Standard medical care alone.
- Primary endpoint
- Distribution of modified Rankin scale scores at 90 days.
Main findings
- Common OR for a better 90-day functional outcome was 1.74 (95% CI 1.19-2.55) with thrombectomy.
- Median time from onset or last-known-well to randomization was 38.5 hours.
- Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 4.8% with thrombectomy versus 0% with medical care alone.
- Ninety-day case fatality was 6.0% versus 1.8%, respectively.
Limitations
The trial was open-label, conducted at comprehensive stroke centers in China, and required favorable imaging selection. The higher symptomatic hemorrhage and mortality signals, plus uncertain external validity, warrant caution pending replication and guideline integration.
Read the primary source
Full text: Abstract available; full text paywalled.
Original sourcePMID: 42929656
Material reviewed: abstract.
Source retrieved Oct 28, 2026. Abstract reviewed; full text unavailable. Primary PubMed record and DOI metadata were verified.
Corrections & review history
No corrections recorded. Human review: not yet human-reviewed.