ICare-FASTER (Improving Care by Faster Risk Stratification Through Use of High-Sensitivity Point-of-Care Troponin in Patients Presenting With Possible Acute Coronary Syndrome in the Emergency Department): A Stepped-Wedge Cluster-Randomized Trial
Summary
ICare-FASTER was a pragmatic stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trial across 6 New Zealand EDs with 59,980 presentations from 44,747 individuals. Using the same accelerated diagnostic pathway, whole-blood point-of-care hs-cTnI reduced adjusted ED length of stay by 13% (95% CI 9%-16%), an absolute 47 minutes (95% CI 33-61) from a control mean of 376 minutes, compared with central-laboratory hs-cTn. Thirty-day myocardial infarction or cardiac death was 0.39% in both groups (P=0.54).
Why it matters
For EDs already using an accelerated troponin pathway, a validated point-of-care hs-cTn assay can materially improve throughput by eliminating laboratory turnaround delay. The result supports an operational change rather than a new diagnostic threshold.
Study at a glance
- Design
- Randomized trial
- Population
- Emergency department presentations for possible acute coronary syndrome at six New Zealand sites.
- Sample size
- 59980
- Intervention
- Accelerated diagnostic pathway using whole-blood point-of-care high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I.
- Comparator
- The same accelerated diagnostic pathway using central-laboratory high-sensitivity cardiac troponin.
- Primary endpoint
- Emergency department length of stay.
Main findings
- Adjusted ED length of stay was reduced by 13% (95% CI 9%-16%; P<0.001).
- The absolute reduction was 47 minutes (95% CI 33-61) from a control mean of 376 minutes.
- Thirty-day myocardial infarction or cardiac death occurred in 0.39% of presentations in both groups (P=0.54).
- The study included 59,980 ED presentations from 44,747 individuals; 31,392 presentations occurred during the intervention phase.
Limitations
This was a stepped-wedge implementation trial at six New Zealand sites, so the effect depends on the specific assay, pathway, staffing, and laboratory workflow. The identical observed 30-day event rates are reassuring but should not be interpreted as a formal proof of safety equivalence.
Read the primary source
Full text: Abstract available; full text paywalled.
Original sourceDOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.126.080866
PMID: 42895015
Material reviewed: abstract.
Source retrieved Oct 28, 2026. Abstract reviewed; full text unavailable. Catch-up: previously missed important publication. Primary PubMed record and DOI metadata were verified.
Corrections & review history
No corrections recorded. Human review: not yet human-reviewed.