Historical collection · First published Nov 13, 2024; added to EM Weekly Oct 27, 2026. This retrospective summary may be superseded by later evidence or guidance.

← All articles
Consensus statementCirculation / American Heart Association

Update on Diagnosis and Management of Kawasaki Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

First online Nov 13, 2024On EM Weekly Oct 27, 2026Discovered Oct 27, 2026AI-generated Not yet human-reviewed

Summary

This 2024 AHA scientific statement updates the 2017 Kawasaki disease guidance on diagnosis, risk stratification, acute treatment, coronary imaging, thromboprophylaxis, and long-term management. Diagnostic criteria remain clinical, while the update emphasizes early diagnosis, consistent coronary Z-score assessment, and identification of high-risk patients; the AHA summary identifies age 6 months or younger or baseline LAD/RCA Z-score at least 2.5 as high-risk features. For high-risk patients, IVIG plus intensified anti-inflammatory therapy is increasingly supported rather than IVIG alone, with treatment and follow-up coordinated by Kawasaki disease experts.

Why it matters

For the ED, prolonged unexplained fever with compatible mucocutaneous findings or incomplete Kawasaki features should trigger early laboratory evaluation, echocardiography/cardiology involvement, and timely IVIG-based treatment rather than waiting for every classic feature to appear. High-risk infants or patients with early coronary dilation may need intensified initial therapy and closer echo surveillance, while corrected thromboprophylaxis details should be managed with pediatric cardiology/Kawasaki expertise.

Study at a glance

Design
Consensus statement
Population
Children with suspected or confirmed Kawasaki disease, including incomplete presentations and patients at risk for or with coronary artery abnormalities.
Sample size
Not applicable
Intervention
Updated AHA recommendations for diagnosis, coronary risk stratification and imaging, IVIG-based acute therapy with intensified anti-inflammatory treatment for selected high-risk patients, and thromboprophylaxis and long-term management of coronary involvement.
Comparator
The 2017 AHA Kawasaki disease scientific statement and prior practice; this update is not a comparative trial.
Primary endpoint
Evidence synthesis and expert guidance for diagnosis, acute treatment, coronary imaging, thromboprophylaxis, and longitudinal management of Kawasaki disease; there is no trial primary endpoint.

Main findings

  • Kawasaki disease remains a clinical diagnosis, and early recognition is emphasized to reduce coronary artery aneurysm risk; the diagnostic classification is unchanged from the 2017 statement.
  • The AHA summary identifies age 6 months or younger or baseline LAD/RCA Z-score at least 2.5 as high-risk features, and increasingly supports IVIG plus intensified anti-inflammatory therapy for high-risk patients.
  • The February 24, 2025 publisher correction changed long-term anticoagulation language: anticoagulation may be considered for risk level 5.2 when a large/giant aneurysm has regressed to medium and thrombosis risk persists, while anticoagulation is not indicated for risk level 5.3 when it has regressed to small; the correction also clarified that treatment intensification applies to IVIG-resistant or high-risk patients.
  • The March 31, 2025 publisher correction changed a Figure 1 diagnostic-criteria item from a sub-bullet to a regular bullet; it did not introduce a new treatment recommendation.

Limitations

This is an AHA scientific statement, not a randomized trial, and several treatment recommendations rely on observational data, extrapolation, or expert consensus. A February 2025 correction materially changed anticoagulation and treatment-table language, and a March 2025 correction fixed Figure 1 formatting; this historical record incorporates those corrections but does not replace current specialist guidance.

Recommendation strength

American Heart Association scientific statement based on literature review and expert consensus; recommendations are not presented as one uniform GRADE-rated set.

Read the primary source

Full text: Official PDF available.

Original source Official source PDF

DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001295

PMID: 39534969

Source retrieved Oct 27, 2026. Historical backfill. PubMed and the American Heart Association Professional Heart Daily summary were reviewed and verify first-online publication on 2024-11-13, DOI 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001295, and PMID 39534969. Two official 2025 publisher corrections were reconciled: DOI 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001313 (article date 2025-02-24) changed anticoagulation and treatment-table language, and DOI 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001324 (Epub 2025-03-31) corrected Figure 1 bullet formatting. The hosted browser could retrieve publisher correction text but PDF screenshot rendering failed with a 403/cache error; the original statement PDF was not reviewed end-to-end, so reviewedMaterial remains official society summary rather than full text.

Corrections & review history

Feb 24, 2025 — Publisher correction DOI 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001313 revised Table 2 anticoagulation language for regressed large/giant coronary aneurysms, added a thrombosis-risk footnote, and clarified Table 3 treatment-intensification and aspirin-related text.

Mar 31, 2025 — Publisher correction DOI 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001324 corrected Figure 1 by changing the palmar/plantar erythema criterion from a sub-bullet to a regular bullet; no new treatment recommendation was introduced by this correction.