Effectiveness of Point-of-Care High-Sensitivity Troponin Testing in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Summary
WESTCOR randomized 1,494 ED patients with possible ACS to 0/1-hour point-of-care hs-cTnI or centralized 0/1-hour hs-cTnT testing. Median ED length of stay was 174 versus 180 minutes, a 6-minute reduction (95% CI -4 to 17), below the prespecified 15-minute clinically meaningful difference. Thirty-day MI, death, or acute revascularization occurred in 11.4% versus 9.4%, with no detected difference in the prespecified safety follow-up.
Why it matters
Point-of-care hs-troponin alone did not meaningfully shorten ED stay in this workflow, so adopting a bedside assay should not be assumed to improve throughput without redesigning the surrounding diagnostic pathway. The studied 0/1-hour regimen remains assay- and system-specific.
Study at a glance
- Design
- Randomized trial
- Population
- Adults presenting to a single Norwegian emergency care clinic with possible acute coronary syndrome; 1,494 included in the final analysis.
- Sample size
- 1494
- Intervention
- 0/1-hour point-of-care high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I testing.
- Comparator
- 0/1-hour centralized laboratory high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T testing.
- Primary endpoint
- Emergency department length of stay; a 15-minute difference was prespecified as clinically meaningful.
Main findings
- Median ED length of stay was 174 minutes with point-of-care testing versus 180 minutes with centralized testing; difference 6 minutes (95% CI -4 to 17).
- The observed throughput difference did not meet the prespecified 15-minute clinically meaningful threshold.
- Thirty-day MI, death, or acute revascularization occurred in 83/728 (11.4%) versus 72/766 (9.4%); no difference was detected.
- The primary abstract did not report a separate adverse-event profile beyond clinical outcome follow-up.
Limitations
Single-center trial comparing different hs-troponin assays as well as different testing locations, with workflow-dependent effects and insufficient precision to establish equivalence for clinical events. Later implementation evidence suggests that operational context materially modifies throughput benefit.
Read the primary source
Full text: Open-access full text available.
Original sourceDOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.03.005
PMID: 40202469
Material reviewed: abstract.
Source retrieved Oct 28, 2026. Primary PubMed abstract and publisher metadata were reviewed; PMID 40202469, DOI 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.03.005, Epub April 9, 2025. Targeted DOI/title correction search found no verified correction. Later 2026 implementation evidence showing a larger LOS reduction was checked as historical context and suggests setting dependence rather than direct contradiction.
Corrections & review history
No corrections recorded. Human review: not yet human-reviewed.