← All articles
Randomized trialAnnals of Emergency Medicine

Effectiveness of Point-of-Care High-Sensitivity Troponin Testing in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial

First online Apr 9, 2025On EM Weekly Oct 28, 2026Discovered Oct 28, 2026AI-generated Not yet human-reviewed

Summary

WESTCOR randomized 1,494 ED patients with possible ACS to 0/1-hour point-of-care hs-cTnI or centralized 0/1-hour hs-cTnT testing. Median ED length of stay was 174 versus 180 minutes, a 6-minute reduction (95% CI -4 to 17), below the prespecified 15-minute clinically meaningful difference. Thirty-day MI, death, or acute revascularization occurred in 11.4% versus 9.4%, with no detected difference in the prespecified safety follow-up.

Why it matters

Point-of-care hs-troponin alone did not meaningfully shorten ED stay in this workflow, so adopting a bedside assay should not be assumed to improve throughput without redesigning the surrounding diagnostic pathway. The studied 0/1-hour regimen remains assay- and system-specific.

Study at a glance

Design
Randomized trial
Population
Adults presenting to a single Norwegian emergency care clinic with possible acute coronary syndrome; 1,494 included in the final analysis.
Sample size
1494
Intervention
0/1-hour point-of-care high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I testing.
Comparator
0/1-hour centralized laboratory high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T testing.
Primary endpoint
Emergency department length of stay; a 15-minute difference was prespecified as clinically meaningful.

Main findings

  • Median ED length of stay was 174 minutes with point-of-care testing versus 180 minutes with centralized testing; difference 6 minutes (95% CI -4 to 17).
  • The observed throughput difference did not meet the prespecified 15-minute clinically meaningful threshold.
  • Thirty-day MI, death, or acute revascularization occurred in 83/728 (11.4%) versus 72/766 (9.4%); no difference was detected.
  • The primary abstract did not report a separate adverse-event profile beyond clinical outcome follow-up.

Limitations

Single-center trial comparing different hs-troponin assays as well as different testing locations, with workflow-dependent effects and insufficient precision to establish equivalence for clinical events. Later implementation evidence suggests that operational context materially modifies throughput benefit.

Read the primary source

Full text: Open-access full text available.

Original source

DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.03.005

PMID: 40202469

Source retrieved Oct 28, 2026. Primary PubMed abstract and publisher metadata were reviewed; PMID 40202469, DOI 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.03.005, Epub April 9, 2025. Targeted DOI/title correction search found no verified correction. Later 2026 implementation evidence showing a larger LOS reduction was checked as historical context and suggests setting dependence rather than direct contradiction.

Corrections & review history

No corrections recorded. Human review: not yet human-reviewed.