Effect of Vasopressin Initiation Threshold on Septic Shock Mortality: The VASSPR Cluster Crossover Randomized Strategy Trial
Summary
VASSPR was a pragmatic, open-label, cluster-randomized cluster-crossover strategy trial across 13 US hospitals involving 3,959 adults receiving vasopressors for septic shock. Hospitals alternated between recommending fixed-dose vasopressin 0.03 U/min when other vasopressors reached 0.1 versus 0.4 micrograms/kg/min norepinephrine-equivalent. Twenty-eight-day mortality was 31.8% versus 33.0% (adjusted marginal OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.87-1.06; adjusted risk difference -0.4 percentage points, 95% CI -2.7 to 1.3), with no difference in kidney replacement therapy-free days.
Why it matters
A policy of routinely adding vasopressin at a much lower norepinephrine-equivalent threshold did not improve mortality. The trial argues against assuming a universal early threshold is superior, while leaving clinician-specific vasopressin use and the optimal threshold unresolved.
Study at a glance
- Design
- Randomized trial
- Population
- Adults receiving vasopressors for septic shock at 13 hospitals in Idaho and Utah.
- Sample size
- 3959
- Intervention
- Hospital strategy recommending vasopressin 0.03 U/min when total other vasopressors reached 0.1 micrograms/kg/min norepinephrine-equivalent.
- Comparator
- Hospital strategy recommending vasopressin when total other vasopressors reached 0.4 micrograms/kg/min norepinephrine-equivalent.
- Primary endpoint
- All-cause mortality at 28 days.
Main findings
- 28-day mortality: 628/1975 (31.8%) with the lower-threshold strategy versus 655/1984 (33.0%) with the higher-threshold strategy; adjusted marginal OR 0.98 (95% CI 0.87-1.06), adjusted risk difference -0.4 percentage points (95% CI -2.7 to 1.3).
- Kidney replacement therapy-free days through day 28 were a median of 29 in both groups.
- Among patients reaching at least 0.07 micrograms/kg/min norepinephrine-equivalent, vasopressin was given to 68.0% versus 42.7%, demonstrating meaningful strategy separation.
- Persistent or new cardiogenic shock occurred in 7.4% versus 6.3% (adjusted marginal OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.01-1.42); this was exploratory and not adjusted for multiple comparisons.
Limitations
The intervention was an open-label hospital strategy rather than mandated patient-level treatment, and strict strategy adherence was imperfect. The 13 hospitals were within two US states, and the possible increase in cardiogenic shock with the lower-threshold strategy was an exploratory safety finding without multiplicity adjustment.
Read the primary source
Full text: Abstract available; full text paywalled.
Original sourcePMID: 42872917
Source retrieved Oct 26, 2026. Full article reviewed through a publisher guest-access page. Routine PDF access requires sign-in or subscription; no paywall-bypassing copy was used.
Corrections & review history
Oct 26, 2026 — Adjusted topic labels to the supported resuscitation and infectious-disease categories.