← All articles
Randomized trialCHEST

Normosol-R vs Lactated Ringers in the Critically Ill: A Randomized Trial

First online Feb 17, 2025On EM Weekly Oct 28, 2026Discovered Oct 28, 2026AI-generated Not yet human-reviewed

Summary

A single-center pragmatic cluster-randomized multiple-crossover study assigned 2,084 critically ill adults to Normosol-R or lactated Ringer's. Mean plasma bicarbonate through day 7 did not differ (difference -0.12 mmol/dL; 95% CI -0.61 to 0.36; P=.61). New kidney replacement therapy occurred in 6.0% versus 5.0% and 30-day death in 16.3% versus 16.0%, without established differences.

Why it matters

This does not support replacing lactated Ringer's with Normosol-R to improve outcomes in eligible critically ill adults. It compares two balanced crystalloids, not saline versus a balanced fluid.

Study at a glance

Design
Randomized trial
Population
Critically ill adults in one academic center; 2,084 enrolled.
Sample size
2084
Intervention
Normosol-R under cluster-randomized crossover assignment.
Comparator
Lactated Ringer's.
Primary endpoint
Mean plasma bicarbonate concentration through day 7.

Main findings

  • Bicarbonate difference -0.12 mmol/dL (95% CI -0.61 to 0.36; P=.61).
  • New kidney replacement therapy 6.0% versus 5.0%, difference 1.0% (95% CI -1.2% to 3.1%).
  • 30-day mortality 16.3% versus 16.0%, difference 0.3% (95% CI -2.9% to 3.6%).
  • Detailed adverse-event data not reported in the reviewed abstract.

Limitations

Single-center ICU trial with a biochemical primary endpoint; absence of significant differences does not prove equivalence. Primary abstract reviewed; linked open-access full text was not reviewed end-to-end.

Read the primary source

Full text: Open-access full text available.

Original source

DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.008

PMID: 39971001

Source retrieved Oct 28, 2026. Primary PubMed abstract PMID 39971001 DOI 10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.008 reviewed, Epub February 17, 2025 versus August print. Legal full text linked but not reviewed. No verified correction found in targeted search.

Corrections & review history

No corrections recorded. Human review: not yet human-reviewed.