← All articles
Consensus statementPrehospital Emergency Care

Prehospital Trauma Compendium: Prehospital Administration of Antibiotics in Trauma Patients - an NAEMSP Resource Document

First online Feb 21, 2025On EM Weekly Oct 29, 2026Discovered Oct 29, 2026AI-generated Not yet human-reviewed
My Library & folders

Summary

This NAEMSP resource document reviewed prehospital prophylactic antibiotics for open fractures and other major open wounds. The evidence synthesis included 13 of 105 identified studies; available combat and civilian evidence was mostly observational and retrospective. The authors conclude that prehospital antibiotics appear safe and may be considered for selected trauma patients, but universal implementation remains unsupported because patient-centered outcome effects, ideal candidates, timing, and regimen remain uncertain.

Why it matters

For EMS-to-ED systems with long transport times or protocols for open fractures, this supports a selective, multidisciplinary protocol discussion rather than routine antibiotics for all injured patients.

Study at a glance

Design
Consensus statement
Population
Prehospital trauma patients with open fractures or other major open wounds
Sample size
Not applicable
Intervention
Prehospital prophylactic antibiotics in selected trauma patients
Comparator
Usual care without prehospital antibiotics
Primary endpoint
Evidence synthesis of safety, implementation, and patient-centered outcomes

Key recommendations

  • The review identified 105 articles and included 13 in its final evidence synthesis.
  • Available combat and civilian data were mostly observational and retrospective; safety appeared acceptable but clinical-outcome benefit was uncertain.
  • The document supports considering locally developed protocols for selected patients, including open fractures or prolonged transport, rather than universal adoption.

Limitations

This is a resource document, not a GRADE-based guideline; no formal bias or certainty assessment was performed. Its evidence base is predominantly observational, and the abstract does not establish a universal regimen or outcome benefit.

Read the primary source

Full text: Abstract available; full text paywalled.

Original source

DOI: 10.1080/10903127.2025.2460203

PMID: 39889226

Source retrieved Oct 29, 2026. Primary PubMed abstract reviewed on 2026-10-29. It reports online-ahead-of-print publication on 2025-02-21 and explicitly states that GRADE and formal bias/strength assessment were not used.

Corrections & review history

No corrections recorded. Human review: not yet human-reviewed.